Multivariate Analysis Applied in Bayesian Metareasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
As Bayesian networks are applied to more complex and realistic real-world applications, the development of more efficient inference approaches is increasingly important. This paper presents a method for metareasoning in Bayesian networks adopting prediction models to select algorithms for the inference tasks, when multiple schemes are used to calculate the propagation of evidence. The proposed method is based on multiple characterizations of Bayesian networks and prediction models to select the algorithm that will provide the best performance in future inferences. Logistic regression analysis is applied to determine when exact algorithms may be used for specific tasks. The prediction models of approximate inference algorithms are created by multiple regression analysis, based on experimental results using Variable Elimination, Gibbs Sampling and Stratified Simulation algorithms. These algorithms belong to exact method, stochastic and deterministic sampling methods, respectively. Experimental analyses compare some alternative models and show better results when multivariate analysis is applied. Key-Words: Bayesian, Metareasoning, Logistic Regression, Multiple Regression, Inferences, Prediction Models
منابع مشابه
Reasoning, Metareasoning, and Mathematical Truth: Studies of Theorem Proving under Limited Resources
In earlier work, we introduced flexible infer ence and decision-theoretic metareasoning to address the intractability of normative infer ence. Here, rather than pursuing the task of computing beliefs and actions with decision models composed of distinctions about uncer tain events, we examine methods for inferring beliefs about mathematical truth before an automated theorem prover completes ...
متن کاملExtended Abstract: Combining CBR and BN using metareasoning
In complex domains, it is often necessary to determine which reasoning method would be the most appropriate for each task, and a combination of different methods has often shown the best results. We examine how two complementary reasoning methods, case-based reasoning and Bayesian networks, can be combined using metareasoning to form a more robust and better-performing system.
متن کاملReasoning, Metareasoning, and Mathematical Truth: Studies of Theorem Proving under Limited Resources 3
In earlier work, we introduced exible inference and decision-theoretic metareasoning to address the intractability of normative inference. Here, rather than pursuing the task of computing beliefs and actions with decision models composed of distinctions about uncertain events, we examine methods for inferring beliefs about mathematical truth before an automated theorem prover completes a proof....
متن کاملToward Boundedly Rational Analysis
The Bayesian program in cognitive science has been subject to criticism, due in part to puzzles about the role of rationality and approximation. While somewhat sympathetic with these concerns, I propose that a thoroughgoing boundedly rational analysis strategy can answer to some of them. Through simulation results I illustrate the method by showing how one can retrodict recently reported result...
متن کاملPredicting waste generation using Bayesian model averaging
A prognosis model has been developed for solid waste generation from households in Hoi An City, a famous tourist city in Viet Nam. Waste sampling, followed by a questionnaire survey, was carried out to gather data. The Bayesian model average method was used to identify factors significantly associated with waste generation. Multivariate linear regression analysis was then applied to evaluate th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008